Skip to Main Content

Great Problems Seminar (GPS): Evaluating Sources

Great Problems Seminar (GPS) resources at the library

Source Evaluation Guidelines

Infographic

Who, What, Why, Where, When and How

What Type of Journal?

Scholarly

Trade

Popular

Audience

Scholars/Experts/Students

Professionals working in the field

General Public

Authors

Scholars/Experts

Professionals in the field or journalists

Reporters

Peer-Reviewed

Yes

No

No

Color Pictures

Few

Yes

Many

Advertisements

Few

Yes, targeted to professionals

Many

Article Length

10+ pages

Ranges

1-5 pages

Article Titles

Long & Descriptive

Ranges

Short & Catchy

Cites Sources

Yes, Required as facts and quotes are verified

Occasional, not required

No

Reading A Scholarly Journal Article

Evaluating Journal Articles

What are their advantages?

Scholarly: Articles are usually evaluated by experts before publication (peer reviewed). Footnotes or bibliographies support research and point to further research on the topic. Authors dsecribe methodology and and supply data to support research results.

Popular: Written for non-specialists. Timely coverage of popular topics and current events. Good sources for topics related to popular culture.

Trade: Timely coverage of industry trends. Sometimes contain short bibliographies. Shorter articles that are informal and practical.

What are their disadvantages?

Scholarly: Articles often use specialized terminology of the field that can be difficult for non-specialists to read. Scholarly journals are expensive and may not be readily available. Research and review process takes time; not as useful for current events or popular culture.

Popular: Articles are selected by editors who may know little about the topic. Authors usually do not cite sources. Published to make a profit; the line between informing and selling may be blurred.

Trade: Not peer reviewed, though author is usually a professional in the field. Use of specialized terminology of the field. Evidence drawn from personal experience or common knowledge but NOT rigorous research.

Adapted from: Evaluating Sources: Using the RADAR Framework,  Loyola Marymount University

Peer-Reviewed Journals

Peer-Review Definition

Peer-review: "A process by which a scholarly work (such as a paper or a research proposal) is checked by a group of experts in the same field to make sure it meets the necessary standards before it is published or accepted."

  - Merriam Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/peer%20review 

What are "peer-reviewed" journals?

A peer-reviewed journal is a respected academic publication. Before articles are published within these types of journals, they are sent by the editors of the journal to other scholars in the field ("peers"), often anonymously, to get feedback on the quality of the scholarship, review research methods, as well as relevance or importance to the field. The article may be accepted, often with revisions suggested, or rejected for publication.  

Peer-reviewed journals are highly respected, and researchers wish to have their works published in them. Many often have low acceptance rates.

One way to find peer reviewed articles is to type your keywords into WPI Library Search, and then choose the filter for Peer-reviewed Journals. You can also search our Databases (organized by subject) for peer-reviewed articles.